The Strip Searches at Kent
On Thursday, March 19, 1998, warden of Kent authorized an exceptional
search of the institution. The IPSO had received information from a prisoner
believed to be reliable that he had recently seen a .22 calibre revolver
and ten to twenty rounds of .22 ammunition. The source believed that the
weapon and ammunition were in the possession of a protective custody prisoner,
but there were plans to sell them to the GP Native Brotherhood, and a
down payment of seven points of heroin had already been paid to the PC
Brotherhood. The search authorization form recited the provisions of s.
53 of the CCRA ; and since there were reasonable
grounds to believe the weapon and ammunition constituted "a clear and
substantial danger to human life or safety or to the security of the penitentiary
. . . a strip search of all the inmates in the penitentiary or any part
thereof is necessary in order to seize the contraband and avert the danger"
(Exceptional Search Authorization Form, Kent Institution, March 19, 1998).
Because it was believed that the weapon and ammunition were still on
the PC side, most likely with particular prisoners in F and G units, it
was determined that the search would begin there. A decision was made
to deploy the Emergency Response Team (ERT) to remove these prisoners
from their cells and conduct the strip searches. The previous week, there
had been a disturbance in G unit which resulted in lockdown of the PC
population. The prisoners in E and F units were locked down without any
problems, but one of the G unit prisoners overturned a table and openly
incited other prisoners to join him in resisting the staff. The "insurrection"
was resolved through negotiations, but the prisoners in G unit had advised
the administration that the next time they wanted to lock down the unit,
they had better come "with all of their friends." In light of that, the
use of the ERT was deemed appropriate. Because the team would already
be suited up, it was decided they should extract and search the targeted
prisoners from F unit as well.
ERT leader Officer Mark Noon-Ward was called into the institution along
with other members of the team. He was briefed by warden and the co-ordinator
of correctional operations. All prisoners housed in G unit and two targeted
prisoners from F unit were to be extracted, strip searched, and escorted
to K unit. In accordance with ERT procedures, Officer Noon-Ward drew up
an operational plan. He requested that, in addition to team members wearing
bulletproof vests, the teams for both F and G units be armed with a rifle
in case they confronted a prisoner with a loaded gun. The Warden rejected
this on the grounds that there was an armed officer in the control bubble
on the units. Other elements of the plan were that each inmate was to
be strip searched, given coveralls, and scanned with metal detector, and
that each cell was to be searched by hand-picked staff after the ERT was
clear. There was no specific discussion during the briefing session about
the method of strip searching, and it was Officer Noon-Ward's understanding
that this would be done in accordance with normal ERT procedures.
Officer Noon-Ward then briefed members of the ERT. The briefing was
videotaped, as would be the rest of the operation. Officer Noon-Ward reiterated
the grounds for the operation -- it was believed there was a weapon and
ammunition in the institution. Two separate teams would be deployed, each
consisting of six members. Each prisoner would be instructed to strip
in his cell prior to the cell door being opened. He would then be instructed
to place his hands behind his back to be handcuffed. He would be escorted
to the common area at the end of the tier, where a thorough search would
be conducted using a hand-held metal scanner. Once the team was satisfied
the prisoner was not in possession of any unauthorized items, he would
be placed in coveralls, handcuffed again and escorted to the entrance
of the unit by the team, then turned over to other staff for escort to
K unit. One team member would be equipped with a gas launcher and other
designated officers would carry a distraction device to use in the event
that the team encountered a serious threat. (These devices, when detonated,
make a very loud noise and are intended to distract anyone in close proximity,
allowing team members to move in and "take down" a prisoner.) The team
members were advised that if they heard the word "gun," they were to move
quickly away from the cell doors so that the distraction devices could
be deployed. Officer Noon-Ward, in reviewing strip search procedures,
stated that prisoners would be asked to lift their "nut sacks." This colloquialism
was not used in a salacious or flippant way and elicited no inappropriate
response from team members. Officer Noon-Ward also emphasized that team
members marching in formation across the courtyard to the units were to
bang their shields loudly.
In a later interview, Mr. Noon-Ward explained the reason for the latter
procedure. It sends a clear signal to prisoners that the team is on its
way and is intended to intimidate them into compliance with the team's
instructions, thereby minimizing the need for resorting to force; it also
reinforces the concept of members working as a team and allows a measured
release of adrenaline so that there is no build-up of tension that may
result in precipitate action.
The cell extractions and strip searches began in F unit with Mr. Garnell.
The videotape shows Mr. Garnell taking off his clothes in his cell, as
ordered, then being placed in handcuffs behind his back and led, facing
backwards, by the team to the common area. Though the prisoner is naked,
the video shows him only from the waist up. This is standard operating
procedure for videotaping strip searches and is done to protect the prisoner's
dignity in the event that the tape is viewed by others. In the common
area, Mr. Garnell was surrounded by ten officers: team members, an officer
designated as the "scribe" to document the team's activities, and a correctional
supervisor, Mr. Cole. He was also under observation by the officer in
the control bubble. Mr. Garnell was searched with a metal wand detector
and was then asked to open his mouth, run his fingers through his hair
and lift his scrotum. According to Officer Noon-Ward's plan, after the
strip search a prisoner was to receive a set of clean coveralls. However,
during the first searches the coveralls had not yet been delivered, so
Mr. Garnell stood naked while his clothes were retrieved from his cell
and carefully inspected by a staff member. He was then given his shorts
and shirt, taken to the door of the unit and escorted by other staff to
K unit. The time that Mr. Garnell stood naked in front of staff was about
seven minutes. (Once the coveralls arrived, this time was reduced to between
three and four minutes.) At no time were disparaging comments made to
Mr. Garnell; Officer Noon-Ward's firm instructions on several occasions
were coupled with the word "please" and Mr. Garnell was fully co-operative
in the procedure. The cell extractions and strip searches of the rest
of the prisoners also took place without incident. The extractions began
at 10:20 p.m., and by 11:00 p.m. all twenty-six prisoners from F and G
units had been removed by the two teams to K unit. The gun and ammunition
were not found. Page 1 of 3
|