|  
            
          The general scheme proposed by the Correctional Law Review -- defining
        different types of searches and linking both the criteria and procedures
        for each type of search to the degree of intrusiveness involved -- has
        been incorporated into the   CCRA.   However,
        the strong recommendation of the C.L.R. that all the search provisions
        be placed in the legislation itself and not left to regulations, was not
        followed. As in the case of the provisions dealing with the disciplinary
        process, the provisions for search are divided between the   Act  
        and the Regulations in a manner which has little to commend it from a
        perspective of either the staffs' or prisoners' understanding of the scheme
        as a whole. As a result, an examination of the search powers of the   CCRA  
        requires a splicing together of the   Act  
        and the Regulations, an exercise that could have been easily avoided.
          In   Appendix C   you will find the main provisions in the   CCRA,  
        the Regulations and the Commissioner's Directives that comprise the code
        on prison searches. As you will quickly discover, they take some digesting.
        In accordance with the C.L.R.'s recommendations, the   CCRA  
        distinguishes both between routine administrative and investigative searches
        and also between types of searches based upon the degree of intrusiveness.
        Thus, s. 46 of the   CCRA   distinguishes between
        "non-intrusive searches", "frisk searches", "strip searches", "body cavity
        searches" and "urinalysis"; sections 49 and 53 provide for emergency and
        exceptional searches. The "prescribed manner" for carrying out the various
        kinds of searches is covered by the   CCR Regulations.  
        The particular provisions of the legislative regime implicated by events
        at Kent in 1998 were s. 53 of the     CCRA    
        and ss. 45 and 46 of the     CCR Regulations    .
        Section 53, which deals with exceptional powers of search, provides:
          (1) Where the institutional head is satisfied that
        there are reasonable grounds to believe that    
           
          (a) there exists, because of contraband, a clear and
        substantial danger to human life or safety or to the security of the penitentiary,
        and    
           
          (b) a frisk search or strip search of all the inmates
        in the penitentiary or any part thereof is necessary in order to seize
        the contraband and avert the danger, the institutional head may authorize
        in writing such a search, subject to subsection (2).    
           
         (2) A strip search authorized under subsection (1) shall be conducted
        in each case by a staff member of the same sex as the inmate.    
         Sections 45 and 46 of the   CCR Regulations  
        set out the prescribed manner for carrying out strip searches:
            45.   A strip search
        shall consist of a visual inspection of the person by a staff member,
        in the course of which inspection the person being searched shall undress
        completely in front of the staff member and may be required to open the
        person's mouth, display the soles of their feet, run their fingers through
        their hair, present open hands and arms, bend over or otherwise enable
        a staff member to perform a visual inspection.
            46.   A strip search and a body cavity
        search shall be carried out in a private area that is out of sight of
        every other person except for one staff member of the same sex as the
        person being searched, which staff member is required to be present as
        a witness unless, in the case of a strip search, the search is an emergency
        as described in subsection 49(4) of the   Act.  
         Page 3 of 3
            |