Measuring Progress (1) -- The Official Paper Trail
The "Mission-driven Special Handling Unit Program" was heralded by the
CSC in almost glowing terms. To quote again from Our
Story :
A look at our history and at the past and recent
experiences in several other correctional systems tells us that units
for potentially dangerous inmates tend to become the Achilles' heels of
the system. We are determined that this will not be the case in the CSC
. . . these inmates, like all others, will be treated with dignity and
afforded the opportunity for personal growth and to address the needs
that have resulted in their placement in a Special Handling Unit. It is
not part of our philosophy to create the worst possible environment purely
as a demonstration that there can be a worse life than the one that inmates
spend under a normal maximum security regime . . .
The development of this new approach continues to
present us with many challenges but it is also a time to enjoy the excitement
that comes with the creative process . . . Staff must continue to have
opportunities to become agents of change and to realize that they are
in a position that affords an ideal opportunity and the capacity to mould
the facility into one of the best "Unit Management" entities in the Service.
Perhaps then, we can begin to report on our positive incidents rather
than only on the negative ones. ( Our Story at 90-91)
The implementation of the 1990 "Mission-driven" and program-oriented
SHU policy can be tracked along two routes; the one left by the CSC's
official paper trail; the other as travelled by prisoners who have lived
under and through the changes. The CSC paper trail is relatively easily
followed. One of the elements of the new policy was the requirement that
there be an annual review of the SHUs and a report presenting observations
and recommendations. An analysis of these annual reports provides a sobering
counterpoint to the "excitement" of the "creative process" prematurely
announced in 1990.
An important part of the 1990 policy was to significantly increase the
program opportunities for prisoners in accordance with their needs and
correctional plans. As the following table makes clear, there were many
more prisoners participating in a substantially larger range of programs
in Prince Albert than in Quebec.
Program |
Number of Participants
|
|
P.A.
|
Quebec
|
Anger Management |
9
|
5
|
Gift of Self-Esteem |
0
|
0
|
Native Elder |
21
|
0
|
Adult Children of Dysfunctional Families |
14
|
|
Drug & Alcohol |
10
|
|
Cognitive Skills |
6
|
|
Breaking Barriers |
5
|
|
(at 26-27)
Despite the existence of more programs at the Prince Albert SHU, the
zero participation in the "Gift of Self-Esteem" spoke as loudly of the
substance of these programs as did the library with the empty bookcase
in the original Millhaven SHU.
The 'new' 1990 policy on the SHUs, in seeking to enhance opportunities
for effective programming and staff/prisoner interaction, recognized that
the existing SHU structures, which highlighted the dominant physical security
philosophy in place when those facilities were built, required significant
modifications to reflect the dynamic security and programming elements
now being encouraged. The 1991-92 report had this to say of progress in
this area:
Primarily due to a lack of resources, minimal physical
construction took place at the SHU. A new isolation and observation cell
outside of the unit was constructed at the Quebec SHU, and there were
no physical changes to the Prairies SHU during the past year. (at 40)
The 1992-93 Annual Report reviewed the progress made during the year,
particularly with regard to promoting and reducing barriers to staff/prisoner
interaction. It can only be described as minimal.
Quebec
Each Correctional Officer 2 has case management responsibilities with
a case load of approximately eight inmates. As well, phone calls between
inmates and their families/friends/lawyer must be co-ordinated through
the inmate's assigned Correctional Officer 2, providing an opportunity
for discussion at these times.
Prairies
Each Correctional Officer 2 has case management responsibilities with
a case load of approximately five inmates. As well, in the past, cleaning
and ground work were done by contract staff, whereas they are now done
by inmates. These inmates are supervised by Correctional Officers which
increases the opportunity for interaction at the line level. (1992-93,
SHU Annual Report, p.3)
Characterising the contact involved in placing a phone call and watching
prisoners clean the range as an "an opportunity for discussion and interaction,"
is the equivalent of describing the prison regime as "milieu therapy."
Page 1 of 4
|