Renous -- Stitching a Slash with Dental Floss
On September 10, 1996, the Task Force continued its national tour by
visiting the four institutions in the Atlantic region, Renous, Springhill,
Dorchester and Nova. The four institutions span the history of the penitentiary
over the last century. Renous, the maximum-security institution for Atlantic
Canada, was opened in 1986 and, together with Port Cartier in Quebec,
is the most modern federal institution for male prisoners in Canada. Dorchester
penitentiary, built in 1880, is the second oldest institution in the country
and one of the three remaining nineteenth century Bastille’s. For most
of its history a maximum-security institution, it is now multi-leveled
and houses the Regional Treatment Centre. Springhill, a medium-securityinstitution,
was built in the 1970s and is a sister institution to Drumheller, Alberta
and Warkworth, Ontario. The largest of the Atlantic institutions it has
a capacity of 600 prisoners. Nova institution is one of the five new regional
institutions for women built to replace the Prison for Women. Completed
in early 1996 it received its first prisoners in July of that year.
At Renous, the Task Force met with members of the Inmate Committee.
Although neither of the two committee members had themselves been in segregation
at Renous, they raised concerns based upon their visits to the segregation
area as part of the Committee responsibilities. They told us that recently
there had been a number of slashings in the segregation area and raised
one case in particular, involving Mr. Merlin. According to the Segregation
Information Sheet given to the Task Force as part of its briefing, Mr.
Merlin had been segregated on the 16th of August for assaulting another
prisoner in the recreation yard. The Committee members said that while
in segregation Mr. Merlin had slashed. After receiving medical attention
and a bandage for the cut, he was returned to his segregation cell. He
then proceeded to stitch up the cut himself using dental floss. One of
the Committee members personally saw the home- made stitches. He also
said that Mr. Merlin was on his range prior to his segregation and that
he had not slashed while in population. One of the unit managers from
Renous, who sat in the meeting with the Inmate Committee, commented that
the staff believed that Mr. Merlin had slashed just so that he could get
a ride to the hospital in Newcastle and some relief from imprisonment.
After the unit manager left the meeting, the Committee ridiculed the idea
that a prisoner would slash just to get a ride to Newcastle. They believed
that Mr. Merlin had slashed because of his treatment in segregation. Following
my visit to Renous, I received a letter from Mr. Merlin describing his
experiences in segregation:
I was placed in segregation for the good order of
the institution for being involved in a fight that occurred August 16,
1996. First off, I have an injured hand where I shattered bones back in
December 1995 while I was a prisoner in Springhill. The surgeon who performed
the operation told me that I would have to have extensive physiotherapy.
I’ve never been taken out for any kind of follow-up treatment while in
Springhill or here. I put numerous requests and complaints into having
treatment done... Getting back to being segregated on the evening of August
16, I injured my hand during the fight. I requested medical treatment
for this and was denied that night except for a bag of ice. On September
2, I was so fed up with being denied medical attention, except for ice,
I smashed the wall and caused my injury to become worse. I believe I tore
internal tendons and tissue. I immediately pressed my cell distress button
because of the pain. The nurse working came up and told me there’s nothing
she could do except give me a bag of ice. Because of the pain, right after
her leaving I took a single razor blade and slashed a gash across my vein
in the middle of my right arm. The slash was approximately one and half
inches long by a half inch wide and quite deep. Immediately I pressed
the distress button again and around fifteen minutes later, guards and
the nurse arrived and took me to Health Care in the institution. The nurse
waited until the bleeding slowed and tried to close the wound with butterfly
tape. I asked to go outside hospital to get the proper medical attention
that I needed but was refused, therefore leaving me with a major open
wound. The day of September 3 I was seen by the institutional doctor.
He recommended X-rays but did not look at the wound on my arm. I presently
have complaints put in on the doctor because of his mishandling of my
medical condition. On the night of September 4, I asked to have a bath
in Health Care so I wouldn’t get the bandages wet but was refused, so
I taped a plastic bag to my arm and took a shower. Because of the moisture
and the size of the wound, the butterflies came loose. Once I noticed
the severity of the wound I pressed the distress button and I was examined
by the nurse that evening. She told me that it was too late for stitches
and that I should have been stitched up in the first place. This left
me with no other choice but to stitch it myself with a sewing needle and
dental floss. Six stitches in all, so I wouldn’t be left with a worse
scar than what it would have been if I was stitched in the first place.
Also, there was a greater risk of infection with an open wound. (Letter
from Michael Merlin, undated, 1997) Page 1 of 1
|